How historically accurate is the movie 'Tora, Tora, Tora'?
Tora! Tora! Tora! (1970) is a major Hollywood motion picture depicting the Japanese attack on the US naval base at Pearl Harbor on December 7, 1941. The Japanese air force attacked the US Fleet at Pearl Harbor, Hawaii, the Pacific's most important American naval base. The Japanese destroyed a significant number of American vessels, and in the process, some 2000 US service personnel were killed. The attack on Pearl Harbor changed the history of the world.
It provoked America into declaring war on Japan, and soon the US was also at war with the other Axis powers, Italy and Germany. Tora! Tora! Tora! is a Japanese-American epic that dramatizes the attack on Pearl Harbor and seeks to be as historically accurate as possible. The film was directed by the American director Richard Fleischer and the Japanese duo of Toshio Masuda and Kanji Fukasaku.
Unlike other war movies of the time, the motion picture did not seek an all-star cast. Rather, it selected well-established and respected actors such as Jason Robards and Joseph Cotton to make it more realistic. The screenplay was based on the research and books of the military historian Ladislas Farago. The production team took great pains to be as accurate as it could. Some of the technical advisors had been involved in various stages of the events at Pearl Harbor in 1941. The film was also committed to providing both an American and Japanese perspective and wanted to avoid US military power glorification.
The film was not well-received, and it was panned by the critics who claimed that it was overlong and tedious. It was a massive hit in Japan, where the audiences liked the sympathetic portrayal of the Japanese. The film is named after the Japanese code name for the assault on Pearl Harbor. Tora means ‘surprise’ or ‘lightning strike’ in the Japanese language. The movie remains very popular to this day, while not considered a classic. Indeed, it has shaped many American and Japanese perceptions of Pearl Harbor. This article will discuss the accuracy of Tora Tora Tora and if it presents a reliable account of the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor.
The film largely portrays the background to the attack on Pearl Harbor very accurately. Tensions had been rising between America and Japan for many years. During WWI, the Japanese and the Americans had been allies. However, when Japan invaded Manchuria in China in 1931, the American government and public were outraged. The relationship between Tokyo and the US deteriorated over the years, especially after the Japanese signed a treaty with Italy and Germany.
The movie clearly shows how poor the relationship between the Americans and Japanese had become by 1941. After the Japanese army had occupied most Indochina, then a French colony with the Vichy French governor's agreement. In response to this, the Americans had placed economic sanctions on Japan, especially on oil export. This was intended to slow the Japanese war machine in China as the Japanese did not have their own oil supplies. This led to the Japanese militarists drawing up a plan to attack the American naval base in Hawaii. The atmosphere of mistrust between the two nations is brilliantly portrayed.
On December 6, 1941, President Franklin D. Roosevelt appealed to the Japanese government for a peaceful resolution of the escalating crisis in the Pacific and received no response. FDR was opposed to the Axis powers, but he did not want to enter the war and maintain US neutrality. The Americans were very concerned about the possibility of a Japanese attack. This is all shown in the motion picture. The movie also makes clear that the US believed that its Pacific fleet was safe in Pearl Harbor. The movie correctly how the US naval command failed to anticipate a Japanese aerial assault on Pearl Harbor.
The movie also shows how the Americans became aware of a Japanese plot to attack Pearl Harbor after decoding some secret communications. The movie shows the intelligence services messaging the US Navy in Pearl Harbor but that they failed to reach those in command. This actually happened. If the US intelligence services message had been relayed to Pearl Harbor in time, they could have defended themselves and denied the Japanese the element of surprise, which was so important in their attack.
The scenes in the movie where the Japanese attacked the US fleet moored in Pearl Harbor are very accurate. The Japanese attack involved several aircraft carriers escorted by battleships that all maintained radio silence as they sailed through the central Pacific. As shown in the movie, the attack did not involve any Japanese warships attacking the US fleet. Rather the entire operations were carried out by Japan's fearsome Zero fighter planes and torpedo bombers. These aircraft took off as shown by Japanese aircraft carriers and made their way to Pearl Harbor, maintaining strict radio silence. The Americans are shown as being taken completely by surprise, and this was the case. This was to prove crucial.
The Japanese attacked the American ships with bombs and torpedoes. They had developed very sophisticated torpedoes, and they were dropped at a low altitude by the Japanese Zeros and sped through the water just below the surface. They detonated when they hit their target. These torpedoes hit many American cruisers and battleships beneath the waterline, and they sank very quickly even though they were moored in the Harbor. This is also shown very dramatically but also very realistically. The American defense's disorganized nature is also shown, and the US fleet's lack of air cover is also accurate. However, the planes that were used in the movie were not actually Japanese Zeros. They were adapted RCAF Harvard (T-6 Texan) training and BT-13 Valiant training aircraft and had the distinctive markings of the Japanese air force painted on their wings and tail-wings.
The movie was able to acquire some planes from the time B-17s and the Curtiss P-40 Warhawk. The US P-40 planes shown in the motion picture are, in reality, only elaborate fiberglass props. The movie does accurately captures the extensive damage and destruction of the attack. The Japanese attack was almost a complete success. However, they failed to sink the US aircraft carriers for the simple reason they were on maneuvers. This meant that the Japanese did not achieve all their objectives, shown very clearly in the movie. In one scene, the Japanese commander of the attack, Admiral Yamamoto, is informed that the US aircraft carriers had not been moored in Pearl Harbor. He clearly shows his disappointment, and he displays a sense of foreboding. The aircraft carriers such as the USS Yorktown were to spearhead the counter-attack against the Japanese in the Pacific.
The Japanese Declaration of War
Despite its attempts to represent the reality of the attack on Pearl Harbor, the movie does not accurately portray the role of the Japanese in the attack. The movie was a joint Japanese-American production, and this perhaps led to some distortions. The first one is that the filmmakers propagated that Pearl Harbor was to suggest that it was not a surprise attack.
The Japanese in the movie is shown preparing a formal declaration of war to be presented to the American Secretary of State in Washington, D.C. This suggests that the Japanese did not want to launch a surprise and illegal attack against international laws and cowardly. The movie indicates that the Japanese failed to submit a war declaration because of some delays and technical difficulties. There was a Japanese document to the Americans, but it was not an official declaration of war, ‘rather it was an ultimatum.’
The government in Tokyo did not intend to declare war on America as this would have ruined their plans for a surprise attack on the US fleet moored in Pearl Harbor. In fact, research indicated that the Japanese delayed this ultimatum at the last minute if it alerted the Americans to the possibility of a military strike. On at least two occasions in the movie, Admiral Yamamoto states that the document was a war declaration. He is shown to be visibly upset when he learns that the document had not been submitted to the American Secretary of State before the attack. This is totally inaccurate. After the war, the Japanese wanted to show that the attack on Pearl Harbor was not cowardly and invented the idea that they had attempted to declare war on the Americans before the events of the 7th of December, 1941. The movie is too reliant on the Japanese interpretation of the events, which are biased and inaccurate.
Another inaccuracy and distortion of the history of the time is the portrayal of Emperor Hirohito. In the movie, he is shown as a moderate man who was essential peace-loving, and that real power lay in the hands of the militarists such as Prime Minister Tojo, who dominated the government. Tora Tora Tora portrays Hirohito as an essential figurehead and who was not responsible in any way for the attack.
The issue of Hirohito’s role in the war has always been controversial. Many have argued that he could have done more to stop the conflict. Indeed, he actively cooperated with the Japanese militarists to create a Japanese Empire in the Asia-Pacific region. The movie goes to great lengths to show that the Emperor was not responsible for the surprise attack on the US Fleet anchored in Hawaii. The motion picture shows the Japanese generals as dominating the Emperor, and his only role was to sign documents that were placed before him.
In reality, the political situation in Tokyo was not as straightforward as suggested in the movie. The makers of the movie would have us believe that the Japanese military practically forced the reluctant Emperor to sign the document that ordered the attack on Pearl Harbor. In fact, Hirohito was a far more powerful figure than indicated. The military had to report to him and that under the constitution of 1936, he was entitled to raise objections to any decision and even veto government actions.
The movie gives the official version of Hirohito's role in the war that he was only a figurehead. It must be remembered that Hirohito was still Emperor of Japan at the time and was a much-revered figure. In fact, the surprise attack on Pearl Harbor was not objected to by Hirohito, and he permitted it to occur. He could have prevented the attack in theory, but he did nothing in so many other instances. The Emperor, it was believed, was sympathetic to the attack on Pearl Harbor and the general aims of the Japanese military, but none of this is shown in the movie.
Tora Tora Tora is a dramatic movie with some great action scenes, and in many ways, it is an accurate portrayal of what happened on that terrible day on the 7th of December 1941. The background to Pearl Harbor and the attack on the US fleet is largely accurate, and in many ways, it does show what actually occurred. However, there are some serious failings in the movie, and they are not the typical inaccuracies in a Hollywood blockbuster. The role of the Japanese in the attack is very inaccurate.
The attempt to show that the Japanese government attempted to submit a formal declaration of war was an effort to gloss over the fact that the attack on Pearl Harbor was a sneak attack that was contrary to all international laws and was a blatant act of aggression. Then the movie's portrayal of the role of Emperor Hirohito was also incorrect, and it understates his role in the events in the run-up to the Japanese attack on the 7th of December 1941. These are serious failings, and they undermine the credibility of the film and give a false sense of the events.
- Clarke, Thurston. Pearl Harbor Ghosts: The Legacy of December 7, 1941. New York: Ballantine Publishing Group, 2001.p. 78
- Clausen, Henry C., and Bruce Lee. Pearl Harbor: Final Judgment. New York: Crown Publishers, Inc., 1992, p. 112
- Clausen, p. 117
- Slackman, Michael. Target: Pearl Harbor. Honolulu: U of Hawaii P, 1990, p. 113
- Collier, Richard. The Road to Pearl Harbor. 1941. New York: Bonanza Books, 1981, p. 112
- Collier, p. 14
- Clausen, p. 11
- Goldstein, Donald M., and Katherine V. Dillon, eds. The Pearl Harbor Papers: Inside the Japanese Plans. New York: Brassey's, 1993. p. 45
- Clausen, p. 23