Changes

Braveheart was a popular movie released in 1995 that won 5 Oscars and featured Mel Gibson as William Wallace. Wallace was a Scottish knight who became a hero in the Scottish rebellions against the English in the late 13th and early 14th century. The movie helped to inspire Scottish national pride while also, to some, represent an early, Medieval warrior who fought for freedom for himself and his people. While much of the story depicted did occur, including the English occupation of Scotland during the time of Edward I, king of England, the depiction of the revolt against the English and other events do not correspond well to historical accounts.

====Early Years of William Wallace====In the movie, William Wallace is suggested to have traveled in Europe during the early years of Edward I's occupation of Scotland. However, little is known about Wallace's early years. First, it is assumed Wallace came from a noble family; two villages are often claimed as his birth places birthplaces (Elderslie and Ellerslie), both on the western part of Scotland.<ref>For more on Wallace's early development years before he revolted against the English, see: Cushing, H. (2010). <i>The life of Sir William Osler.</i> [Vol. 1]: [...] (Nachdr. der Orig.-Ausg., Oxford. Hamburg: Severus Verl.</ref> We do know that Wallace was an experienced swordsman and knight, which indicates he may have fought in wars prior to his own rebellion and participation in the wars against the English. In fact, one possibility is he fought with king Edward I as a mercenary during that king's wars against the Welsh. That may have been the most feasible path for him to have gained fighting experience and possibly learn about English war tactics.<ref>For more on William Wallace the knight, see: Brown, C. (2005). <i>William Wallace: The True Story of Braveheart.</i> Stroud: Tempus.</ref>

==Revolt Against the English==In the movieWe know that Wallace was an experienced swordsman and knight, William Wallace began fighting against the English after the death of indicating he may have fought in wars before his wife own rebellion and participation in 1297, who according tot he movie was killed by the wars against the English. In fact, no records exist of William Wallace having ever been married. However, a later poem did mention one possibility is he had fought with King Edward I as a wife mercenary during that was killed and it led him to seek revengeking's wars against the Welsh. More likely, Wallace was either ambitious to break English authority or resented English occupation of his ancestral lands. This That may have been why he became one of the leading early Scottish rebelsmost feasible path for him to have gained fighting experience and possibly learn about English war tactics. Braveheart also suggests that <ref>For more on William Wallace's actions in response to his wife's death triggered to a wider rebellion against , the Englishknight, see: Brown, C. (2005). <i>William Wallace: The True Story of Braveheart.</i> Stroud: Tempus. </ref>

However, a rebellion across various parts of Scotland had already started====Revolt Against the English====In the movie, with William Wallace joining Williambegan fighting against the English after his wife's death in 1297, who, Lord of Douglas as an ally. One of according to tot the first major acts of rebellion movie, was killed by the assassination English. In fact, no records exist of the Sheriff of Lanark, William HeselrigWallace having ever been married. The account by Thomas Grey does indicate However, a later poem mentioned he had a woman or girl present with William Wallace. Some have suggested this was his wifekilled, which led him to seek revenge. Similar to the movieMore likely, Wallace may have left the town initially then came back with some supporters was either ambitious to lead an attack where the Sheriff was then killedbreak English authority or resented his ancestral lands' English occupation. As the events occurred at the same time as other rebellious acts across Scotland, the attack This may have been a premeditated and coordinated eventwhy he became one of the leading early Scottish rebels.<ref>For more on the events Braveheart also suggests that led up Wallace's actions in response to the Battle of Sterling Bridge and Wallacehis wife's murder of death triggered a wider rebellion against the Sheriff of Lanark, see: Tranter, N. G. (1975). <i>The Wallace.</i> London: CoronetEnglish.</ref>

After the murder of the sheriffHowever, a rebellion across various Scotland parts had already started, with William Wallace took some time to organize his forcesjoining William, Lord of Douglas, as other parts an ally. One of Scotland began to rebel and side with the spreading first major acts of rebellion. While Wallace was portrayed as the leader in this revoltassassination of the Sheriff of Lanark, several people, in addition to Wallace, began to lead the early rebellionWilliam Heselrig. The first major battle account by Thomas Grey does indicate a woman or girl present with William Wallace fought in was the Battle of Sterling Bridge, which occurred on September 11, 1297. This battle Some have suggested this was a turning point as it gave Wallace his fighting reputationwife. In Like the movie, Wallace may have left the town initially then came back with some supporters to lead an attack where the Sheriff was killed. As the English are tricked into marching their heavy cavalry into a trapevents occurred simultaneously with other rebellious acts across Scotland, with the resulting infantry slaughtered in attack may have been a futile chargepremeditated and coordinated event.<ref>For more on the events that led up to the Battle of Sterling Bridge and Wallace's rolemurder of the Sheriff of Lanark, see: Magnusson Tranter, MN. G. (20011975). <i>Scotland: The Story of a NationWallace.</i> (Paperback ed). London: HarperCollinsCoronet.</ref>

In reality, After the battle was won by murder of the Scottish because the English became trapped on Sterling Bridgesheriff, Wallace took some time to organize his forces, where they were not able as other parts of Scotland began to use their superior numbersrebel and side with the spreading rebellion. Many English soldiers fell While Wallace was portrayed as the leader in the river this revolt, several people and likely died from drowning as Wallace began to lead the bridge may have collapsed during the battleearly rebellion. The victory by first major battle William Wallace may have largely fought in was the Battle of Sterling Bridge, which occurred because on September 11, 1297. This battle was a turning point as it gave Wallace his fighting reputation. In the movie, the English assumed Wallace would let them cross are tricked into marching their heavy cavalry into a trap, with the bridge, as that may have been considered resulting infantry slaughtered in a futile charge.<ref>For more in line with on the rules Battle of war or assumed rules at the time. In effect, Sterling Bridge and Wallace may have won because he simply didn't follow this rules role, see: Magnusson, realizing the narrowing M. (2001). <i>Scotland: The Story of the bridge could be used to his advantage and launching the attack as the English tried to crossa Nation</i> (Paperback ed). London: HarperCollins.</ref>

In reality, the battle was won by the Scottish because the English became trapped on Sterling Bridge, where they were not able to use their superior numbers. Many English soldiers fell in the river and likely died from drowning as the bridge may have collapsed during the battle. Wallace's victory may have largely occurred because the English assumed Wallace would let them cross the bridge, as that may have been considered more in line with the rules of war or assumed rules at the time. In effect, Wallace may have won because he didn't follow this rule, realizing the bridge's narrowing could be used to his advantage and launching the attack as the English tried to cross. It was after the battle that Wallace was likely named as guardian of the kingdom in March 1298.<ref>For more on how Wallace became guarding of Scotland, see: Murison, A. F. (2003). <i>William Wallace: Guardian of Scotland.</i> Mineola, N.Y: Dover Publications.</ref> In the movie, the noblemen are seen as less than trusting of Wallace and more willing to give the English their loyalty. More likely, much of Scotland was in open revolt, although parts of it did stay under English control , and there were noblemen loyal to the English. Notably, Edinburgh and its it is well -fortified castle remained in English hands. After the battle, the Scots began to raid parts of northern England. The movie, the main city in the north, suggests York was sacked, although this likely did not happen. The raids of northern England in 1297 by Wallace, nevertheless, may have been momentous and much destruction is suggested by contemporary chroniclers.<ref>For more on these raids, see: Brown, C. (2014). <i>William Wallace: The Man and the Myth.</i></ref> Such destruction was used by the English as part of their evidence against him when he was captured years later. The Wallace's raids by Wallace were designed to provoke the English and undermine their authority, leading to potentially potential rebellion within England against the king. This forced Edward's hand into mounting a more serious invasion into Scotland.

After a period where a large English army then gathered to invade Scotland, where the Scots were mostly content with raiding these forces, a pitched battle finally occurred at the Battle of Falkirk on July 22, 1298. Edward saw his chance their there as the Scots willingly gave him battle rather than continue their raiding of English forces' raiding. This time, and similar to the movie, the Scots were decimated by English longbowmen.<ref>For more on the Battle of Falkirk, see: Henty, G. A. (2002). <i>In Freedom’s Cause: A Story of Wallace and Bruce.</i> Mineola, N.Y: Dover.</ref> However, it is very unlikely implausible that Robert the Bruce, the future king of Scotland and leader of the Scottish revoltleader, betrayed Wallace, as suggested in the movie. In fact, the movie suggests rather than Wallace's failure, it . It was a lack of Scottish support that cost him the battle. More likely, the battle's main failure of the battle may have been poor planning on the part of Wallace, who may have done better by simply harassing the English forces from a distance rather than face a far larger enemy in open combat. After the battle, he may have been so humiliated that he willing willingly resigned his role as guarding of Scotland or was stripped of this title.

==Death of ==How did William Wallacedie?====

After the defeat at Falkirk, Wallace may have left for France or even Rome for a period of time. It is possible he was seeking assistance from the French and Pope for the Scottish cause. This is likely since there were wars between the French and English at this time , and Wallace would have tried to appeal to a willing English enemy if he could. Sometime around 1304, Wallace likely returned to England and continued to raid parts of English occupied Scotland.<ref>For events after the Battle of Falkirk in Wallace's life, see: Hamilton, J. S. (2010). <i>The Plantagenets: History of a Dynasty</i>. London ; New York: Continuum, pg. 79.</ref>  The movie depicts an aging Edward I as being tormented by William Wallace. The attacks were shown as successful skirmishes in most cases, but it is likely these attacks were either likely negligible, failures, or were insignificant to affect . They did not have a meaningful impact on the English presence in Scotland. More likely, Edward I probably most likely did not consider Wallace a major threat at this point and because Wallace was more in a desperate state trying struggling to raise a an army after the disaster at Falkirk.  Additionally, he probably had a weakened position in Scotland. As suggested in the movie, Wallace was betrayed by a Scottish noble (John de Menteith) who was loyal to Edward in 1305. Wallace was captured and soon put on trial for treason at Westminster Palace. At the trial, he did seem to say that he was not guilty of treason because he never claimed loyalty to the English crown. This was depicted in the movie. However, he was also charged with other offenses, such as pillaging civilians. This charge was probably true because he did lead raids into northern England.

Additionally, he probably had a weakened position in Scotland. Wallace was betrayed, as suggested in the movie, by a Scottish noble (John de Menteith) who was loyal to Edward in 1305. Wallace was captured and soon put on trail for treason at Westminster Palace. At the trial, he did seem to say that he was not guilty of treason, the charge he was tried with, because he never claimed loyalty to the English crown, as depicted in the movie. However, he was also charged with other offenses. Among the charges brought against him were those related to his pillaging of civilians, which was probably at least partially true, during his raids in the north of England. By the end of August 1305, Wallace was found guilty and drawn and quartered, a death reserved for traitors. Wallace's body parts and head were displayed in different parts of England to make an example against those considering of revolting against the English king.<ref>For more on the capture and execution of William Wallace, see: Ross, D. R. (2005). <i>For Freedom: The Lasts Days of William Wallace</i>. Edinburgh: Luath Press.</ref>

Despite Wallace's death, he is shown as gaining revenge by impregnating the future consort of the king of England's future consort, Edward II's wife, Isabella of France. In fact, at this point shortly before Wallace's deathreality, Isabella would have been no older than 9 years of age at this time and not yet married to Edward II.<ref>For more on Isabella and her life, see: Warner, K. (2016). <i>Isabella of France, The Rebel Queen: The Story of the Queen who Deposed her Husband , Edward II.</i> Gloucestershire, England: Amberley Publishing.</ref> In other words, she She was not even in England yetat this time. While Edward II is portrayed as effeminate, where historical records do indicate he was possibly homosexual, gay. But his role in English rule was not significant until after his father's reign. However, because Edward II was a relatively weak king, this did allow the Scots to did successfully rebel against him. Robert the Bruce, in many ways, was far more successful than William Wallace, as he successfully rebelled from the English and Scotland regained its independence under his reign. The Battle of Bannockburn, as suggested by the movie, was a major turning point, although many years of fighting and rebellion occurred before and after that battle between the Scots and English. Nevertheless, as the movie suggests, the Scots did gain their independence after the reign of Edward I.

Robert the Bruce, in many ways, was far more successful than William Wallace. He successfully rebelled against England, and Scotland regained its independence under his reign. The Battle of Bannockburn, as suggested by the movie, was a major turning point. Bannockburn was the culmination of years fighting the Scots and English. Nevertheless, as the movie suggests, the Scots did gain their independence after Edward I's reign. ====Conclusion====Much of William Wallace's life has now been steeped in myth, where in actuality very little is known about him. Most of what we do know deriving derives from primary accounts center around the battles from 1297-1298 and when he was captured in August 1305. Nevertheless, William Wallace did, for various reasonreasons, gain a symbolic importance.  Later stories, such as <i>Exploits and Death of William Wallace </i> , helped to create a romantic and tragic character, perhaps more similar to later figures rather than William Wallace. Nevertheless, the significance of William Wallace is evident to the Scotland's national character of Scotland , where today , many statues and monuments are dedicated to him. <youtube>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ojBwASARAzo</youtube>

====Related DailyHistory.org Articles====

{{Mediawiki:British History}}====References====