Changes

Jump to: navigation, search
no edit summary
Many Indians proved willing to accept rule and they did no try to oppose or rebel against the British presence in their lands, for they recognized the benefits of their rule. For decades, war had been endemic <ref>Bandyopadhyay, Sekhar. From Plassey to Partition: A History of Modern India (New Delhi and London: Orient Longmans, 2004), p. 59</ref>" . However, the areas that came under the direct and indirect influence of the British tended to be more stable. They discouraged those local rulers who were under their influence to restrain from attacking their neighbors and as a result, the level of violence in the country began to decline. This persuaded many to accept the British even though they were aware of their exploitation of their lands. With the growing stability trade and economic activity increased over years of decline and this ensured that many local elites cooperated with the British <ref> Spear, p. 98 #.</ref>". Furthermore, the British tolerated all the various creeds and beliefs in India. They did not seek to impose any religion or ideology on the Indians and in a sense they revived the tolerant policies of many Indian rulers such as Ashoka and Akbar the Great. This reconciled many Indians, especially Hindus to the British Raj.<ref>Peers, Douglas M. ''India under Colonial Rule 1700–1885'' (Harlow and London: Pearson Longmans, 2003) p. 163.</ref>. Furthermore, the British adopted a light-touch approach to government and they did not interfere with Indian customs and way of life. In fact, many Indians had no direct contact with the British in the early decades of their rule and this meant that there was relatively little popular opposition to their rule. These all helped to ensure that the British were able to rule a vast and diverse territories.
 
Emperor Aurangzeb on Horseback ca. 1690–1710 The Cleveland Museum of Art|thumbnail|200px

Navigation menu