Changes

[[File: ST_Clairs_Defeat_1791.jpg|300px|thumbnail|left|Historical Marker at the Location of St. Clair’s Defeat in Ohio]]__NOTOC__On November 4, 1791, on the banks of the Wabash River in what is now western Ohio, the United States Army suffered its worst defeat of the entire U.S.-Indian Wars. The battle itself , alternatively known as St. Clair's Defeat, the Battle of the Wabash, the Battle of the Wabash River or the Battle of the Thousand Slain, remains little known among most Americans and has been researched and written about very little in somewhat ignored by academia. Although three times more Americans lost their lives in this [https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B000SHPTG0/ref=as_li_tl?ie=UTF8&camp=1789&creative=9325&creativeASIN=B000SHPTG0&linkCode=as2&tag=dailyh0c-20&linkId=709579ee412a47132bf55a75a34753ac battle than at Little Bighorn], it is usually typically referred to as [https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0190614455/ref=as_li_tl?ie=UTF8&camp=1789&creative=9325&creativeASIN=0190614455&linkCode=as2&tag=dailyh0c-20&linkId=b6750a7411c6c9cef6bc3091b217137a “St. Clair’s Defeat” instead of being named for the nearest town or geographical marker. Some academics attribute the lack of interest in the battle to the American commander, General Arthur St. Clair, who as governor of the Northwest Territory was more of a politician than a general. Others point to the apparent anonymity of the Indian leaders – modern scholars believe they know what chiefs led the warriors in battle, but are not sure about their roles. Whatever the reasons for the lack of interest in the battle, all scholars agree that it played a pivotal role in the Northwest Indian War (1785-1795), setting the stage for future American-Indian conflicts].

As important as St. Clair’s Defeat may have been Some academics attribute the lack of interest in the wider geo-political situation between battle to the Northwest Indian tribesAmerican commander, the infant United States, and Great BritainGeneral Arthur St. Clair, who as governor of the immediate question that many ask is: how Northwest Territory was the United States Army beaten so soundly by an Indian army? The answer is more of course a bit complex and involves an examination politician than a general. Others point to the apparent anonymity of both armies. For the AmericansIndian leaders – modern scholars believe they know what chiefs led the warriors in battle, but are not sure about their leadership was sub-parroles. Whatever the reasons for the lack of interest in the battle, which was especially pronounced all scholars agree that it played a pivotal role in poor planning, intelligence, and logistics. On the other handNorthwest Indian War (1785-1795), setting the Indians were a unified and committed army who were led by able and seasoned leadersstage for future American-Indian conflicts.

As significant as St. Clair’s Defeat may have been in the broader geopolitical situation between the Northwest Indian tribes, the infant United States, and Great Britain, the immediate question that many ask is: how was the United States Army beaten so soundly by an Indian army? The answer is, of course, a bit complex and involves an examination of both armies. For the Americans, their leadership was sub-par, which was especially pronounced in poor planning, intelligence, and logistics. On the other hand, the Indians were a unified and committed army who were led by able and seasoned leaders. ====The Western Indian Confederacy====

Many of the eastern Indian tribes supported the British during the American Revolution because they were told the British would stop or severely limit white migration and settlement west of the Appalachian Mountains and south of the Great Lakes. Whether that would have actually happened is irrelevant because the Americans won and the British allied tribes were forced to move farther west. The Miami, Shawnee, and Delaware tribes ended up in what are now the states of Ohio and Indiana, but was in the late eighteenth century the Northwest Territory.  The tribes formed a number of several semi-permanent communities, one of which was comprised of seven villages at the headwaters of the Maumee River near what is today the city of Fort Wayne, Indiana. Farther up the Maumee River, where it meets the Auglaize River near the modern city of Defiance, Ohio, there was another Indian community known as “The Glaize.” The Glaize was established in 1789, becoming a home and meeting place for the different western tribes. The Glaize was also home to British and French trading posts and became the headquarters of the Western Indian Confederacy. <ref> Tanner, Helen Hornbeck. “The Glaize in 1792: A Composite Indian Community.” <i>Ethnohistory</i> 25 (1978) p. 16</ref> The Americans viewed this strong Indian presence in the Northwest Territory as an impediment to their long-term goals. With that said, many members of President Washington’s administration believed the tribes could be dealt with peacefully, as long as the British were not in the picture. ====Continued British Influence====Under the Treaty of Paris of 1783, which recognized American independence, the British were to cede the land west of the Appalachians to the Mississippi River and south of the Great Lakes to the United States. The British were also to close their forts within that area and end their support with the Indian tribes. The British neglected to close their forts in the Northwest Territory and continued to trade with the Indians at the Glaize and other locations. When the Western Indian Confederacy formed in 1786, the British helped armed the new army and offered them logistical support. The Shawnee chief, Blue Jacket, in particular, was known to work and trade with the British, but most of the Western Indian Confederacy tribal leaders maintained working relations with the British. <ref> Tanner, pgs. 16-18</ref> President Washington was not happy with the British-Indian situation in the Northwest, but in the late eighteenth century it would be the Indians who suffered the brunt of American anger. ====The U.S. Goes to War against the Western Indian Confederacy====<dh-ad/>As the Northwest Indian War raged, Secretary of War Henry Knox ordered the construction of Fort Washington in 1789 on the banks of the Ohio River in the location of what is today Cincinnati. Fort Washington was to be the first in a series of forts throughout the Northwest Territory extending to the headwaters of the Maumee River, <ref> Williams, Samuel C. “The Southwest Territory to the Aid of the Northwest Territory.” <i>Indiana Magazine of History</i> 37 (1941) p. 152</ref> which would eventually either lead to the total defeat of the Western Confederacy or its banishment west of the Mississippi.  The military began mustering a large force of both regular army and militia in 1790 in anticipation of this major campaign, which was led by General Josiah Harmar. The campaign was ill-advised and began with Knox telegraphing its moves by warning the British, who in turn warned their Indian allies. Although Harmar was able to burn about 300 Indian villages, he lost 200 men in battle and returned to Fort Washington defeated. <ref> Tanner, p. 16</ref> Harmar’s loss meant that Knox would attempt to use diplomacy with the Indians one last time. The gulf between the desires of the Americans and Western Indian Confederacy was too great, though, so the talks ended in the spring of 1791. <ref> Tanner, p. 31</ref> Both sides began mobilizing for war, and it soon became apparent which side was better prepared.

===Continued British Influence===Under the Treaty of Paris of 1783, which recognized American independence, the British were to cede the land west of the Appalachians to the Mississippi River and south of the Great Lakes to the United States. The British were also to close their forts within that area and end their support with the Indian tribesAlthough General Arthur St. The British neglected to close their forts Clair requited himself quite well in the Northwest Territory French and continued to trade with the Indians at the Glaize Indian War and other locations. When the Western Indian Confederacy formed American Revolution, he was fifty-four-years-old in 1786, the British helped armed the new army 1791 and offered them logistical supportpast his prime as a soldier. St. The Shawnee chief, Blue Jacket, in particular was known to work and trade with Clair had for the British, but most of part moved on past his military career and was at the Western Indian Confederacy tribal leaders maintained working relations with the Britishtime a civilian leader. <ref> Tanner, pgs. 16-18</ref> President Washington He was not happy with the British-Indian situation in governor of the NorthwestTerritory, but in he still had a longing for the late eighteenth century it would be military and wanted to lead a force to defeat the Indians who suffered the brunt of American angerWestern Indian Confederacy personally.

===The U.S. Goes to War against the Western Indian Confederacy===As the Northwest Indian War raged, Secretary of War Henry Knox ordered the construction A force of regular army and militia began mustering at Fort Washington in 1789 on the banks of the Ohio River in the location summer of 1791 to finish what is today Cincinnati. Fort Washington was to be Harmar had started by destroying the first in a series of forts throughout the Northwest Territory extending to the headwaters of the Maumee RiverMiami, <ref> WilliamsShawnee, Samuel Cand Delaware villages and erecting U. “The Southwest Territory to the Aid of the Northwest TerritoryS.” <i>Indiana Magazine of History</i> 37 (1941) p. 152</ref> which would eventually either lead to the total defeat of the Western Confederacy or its banishment west of the MississippiArmy forts. The military began mustering a large force of both regular more than 2,000 man army left Fort Washington and militia quickly built two forts in 1790 in anticipation October before coming to the headwaters of this major campaign, which was led by General Josiah Harmar. The campaign was ill-advised and began with Knox telegraphing its moves by warning the British, who Wabash River in turn warned their Indian allies. Although Harmar was able to burn about 300 Indian villages, he lost 200 men in battle and returned to Fort Washington defeatedearly November. <ref> TannerWilliams, p. 16153</ref> Harmar’s loss meant that Knox It would attempt to use diplomacy with the Indians one last timebe at this location where St. The gulf between the desires of the Americans and Western Indian Confederacy was too great, though, so the talks ended in the spring of 1791. <ref> Tanner, p. 31</ref> Both sides began mobilizing for war and it soon became apparent which side was better preparedClair would be handed his humiliating defeat.

Although General Arthur St. Clair requited himself quite well in the French and Indian War and the ====American Revolution, he was fifty-four-years-old in 1791 and past his prime as a soldier. St. Clair had for the most part moved on past his military career and was at the time a civilian leader. He was the governor of the Northwest Territory, but he still had a longing for the military and wanted to personally lead a force to defeat the Western Indian Confederacy. A force of regular army and militia began mustering at Fort Washington in the summer of 1791 to finish what Harmar had started by destroying the Miami, Shawnee, and Delaware villages and erecting U.S. Army fortsWeaknesses====[[File: ArthurStClair. The more than 2,000 man army jpg|250px|thumbnail|left Fort Washington and quickly built two forts in October before coming to the headwaters of the Wabash River in early November. <ref> Williams, p. 153</ref> It would be at this location where |Arthur St. Clair would be handed his humiliating defeat. (1737-1818)]]

The Logistical problems compounded the lack of intelligence was compounded by logistical problems. Although St. Clair brought cannons on the campaign that were enough to give an edge in any battle, they were misused from the start. He had the cannons placed on a bluff overseeing the battlefield, but they were aimed too high and did no damage. <ref> Eid, p. 73</ref> The cannons could have given the Americans a major advantage in the battle, but instead they became a hinderancehindrance.  Another logistical mistake St. Clair made was dividing or allowing his camp to divide into two separate camps. The militia camped on the opposite side of the river from the army regulars, which proved to be a great advantage for the Indian forces once the battle began. <ref> Williams, p. 154</ref> The camp division between the regular army and the militia was indicative of more significant divisions and problems within the American force. About half of the men on the battlefield were backcountry militia, many from Kentucky, who were poorly trained and had problems with the authority of the regular army officers. <ref> Williams, p. 156</ref> Not long after the force left Fort Washington, the lack of discipline among the militia members was exacerbated by illnesses that afflicted the troops, including St. Clair. Many of the militia members deserted and St. Clair was forced to send regular army soldiers to retrieve them, decreasing the size of the American force to about 1,000 men on the eve of the battle. <ref> Williams, p. 154</ref> The American force was beset by numerous problems, while on the other hand the Indians had many advantages going into the battle.  ====Western Indian Confederacy Strengths====

Another logistical mistake Militarily speaking, the tribes of the Western Confederacy valued individualism and generally eschewed dictatorial type leadership on the battlefield. This philosophy generally cost them against the Americans, even when they had British supplied guns, but they were able to change their outlook when they faced St. Clair made was dividing, or allowing his camp to divide into two separate campstemporarily. The militia camped on the opposite side leaders of the river from Western Indian Confederacy all came together to assign their campaign against the army regularsAmericans as a tribally mandated one, which proved to be made it a national or even a great advantage for the Indian forces once the battle beganracial war. <ref> WilliamsEid, p. 15482</ref>

The camp division between the regular army and the militia It was emblematic of greater divisions and problems within the American force. About half of the men on the battlefield were backcountry militia, many from Kentuckytherefore, who were not very well trained a war that transcended individual glory and had problems with the authority of the regular army officersone where victory was more important than taking scalps or booty. <ref> Williams, p. 156</ref> Not long after the force left Fort Washington, the lack It is believed that Little Turtle of discipline among the militia members Miami tribe was exacerbated by illnesses that afflicted the troops, including St. Clair. Many of the militia members deserted primary war chief and St. Clair he was forced to send regular army soldiers to retrieve them, decreasing the size supported by Blue Jacket of the American force to about 1,000 men on the eve Shawnee tribe and Buckongahelas of the battleDelaware. <ref> WilliamsTanner, p. 15420</ref> The American force was clearly beset by many problemschiefs relinquished some of their authority over their warriors to Little Turtle, while on the other hand the Indians had many advantages going into who in turn listened to their council before and during the battle.

===Western Indian Confederacy Strengths===Militarily speakingLittle Turtle and the other chiefs probably shadowed St. Clair’s army for some time, gauging its strengths and weaknesses in the tribes of process and picking the Western Confederacy valued individualism time and generally eschewed dictatorial type leadership place to strike. Finally, on the battlefield. This philosophy generally cost them against the Americansevening of November 4, even when they had British supplied guns1, but they were able to temporarily change their outlook when they faced St. Clair. The leaders of 000 warriors from the Western Indian Confederacy all came together to assign their campaign against emerged from the Americans as a tribally mandated one, which made it a national or even a racial war. <ref> Eid, p. 82</ref> It was therefore a war that transcended individual glory and one where victory was more important than taking scalps or booty. It is believed that Little Turtle forests of the Miami tribe was headwaters of the primary war chief Wabasha River and he attacked the Kentucky militia camp. The militia was supported by Blue Jacket of caught off guard and quickly retreated to the Shawnee tribe and Buckongahelas other side of the Delaware. <ref> Tannerriver, pwhich caused even more confusion among the Americans. 20</ref> The chiefs relinquished some of their authority over Americans responded with their own charge, but the Indian warriors did a feigned retreat to Little Turtlethe woods, who in turn listened to their council before and during the battlewhere more warriors were waiting.

Little Turtle and the other chiefs probably shadowed St. Clair’s army for some time, gauging its strengths and weaknesses in the process and picking the time and place to strike. Finally, on the evening of November 4, 1,000 warriors from the Western Indian Confederacy emerged from the forests of the headwaters of the Wabasha River and attacked the Kentucky militia camp. The militia were caught off guard and quickly retreated to the other side of the river, which caused even more confusion among the Americans. The Americans responded with their own charge, but the Indian warriors did a feigned retreat to the woods, where more warriors were waiting. While some Indian warriors were fighting the front line of the Americans, others were using the cover to take focused, sniper shots at American officers and the artillery batteries. Eventually, the Indian warriors formed a crescent that outflanked the American artillery batteries, forcing the Americans to spike the cannons. <ref> Eid, p. 83</ref> After three hours the battle was lost, forcing St. Clair to take what was left of his forces and limped back to Fort Washington. The Americans lost more than 600 men, while the Western Indian Confederacy only lost twenty-one of their warriors.

====Conclusion====Depending on one’s perspective, St. Clair’s defeat was the greatest victory by an Indian force against the Americans, or the worst defeat by the American military at the hands of an Indian adversary. Although the outcome of the battle shocked many Americans at the time, an examination reveals that the factors that led to the Indian rout were very clearapparent. The American force had severe problems with a lack of intelligence, logistical problems, and morale moral issues. On the other hand, the Indian force was better prepared and much more motivated. Although the Western Indian Confederacy would lose the Northwest Indian War, their victory over General Arthur St. Clair became one of the most important battles in early American history.

<div class="portal" style='float:left; width:35%'>=References===Related Articles===={{#dpl:category=18th Century History|ordermethod=firstedit|order=descending|count=7}}</div>