Changes

Jump to: navigation, search

What were the causes of the Second Punic War

27 bytes added, 03:18, 27 April 2020
no edit summary
<youtube>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hKyVujWhj90&t=12s</youtube>
 
__NOTOC__
[[File: 1200px-Las Glorias Nacionales, 1852 1003004 (4013949334).jpg|300px|thumbnail|left| A re-imagining of Hannibal and his army in battle in Spain]]
Hannibal Barca (247-183 BCE) is one of the best-known figures from the Ancient World. He is generally considered one of the greatest generals in history and Rome’s most formidable enemy. Hannibal in the Second Punic War (218-201 BCE) almost inflicted a total defeat on the Roman Republic. This war is often simply known as Hannibal’s war. The story of the conflict is well known, such an event as his heroic crossing of the Alps have has become legendary. Less well known, are the causes of the Second Punic War. Below is a discussion of the origins of the second great war between Carthage and Rome. It will be argued that the causes of the Second Punic War were Carthage’s intrigues with the Celts, Hannibal’s rivalry with Rome in Spain , and the great Carthaginian’s general thirst for revenge on Rome.
===Background===
===Carthage and Hannibal===
The Second Punic War was often known as Hannibal’s War in Rome.<ref> Garland, p. 113</ref> It was in a real sense the personal war of Hannibal. The Barcid was the main driver of the conflict between Carthage and Rome. The government of Carthage was divided over their support for Hannibal in Spain and they were not really in favor of another war with Rome. Their city had suffered too much in the war and in its aftermath during the ‘Mercenary War’ and there was a strong pro-peace party in the city .<ref>Rich, John. "The origin of the second Punic War." Bulletin of the Institute of Classical Studies. Supplement, no. 67 (1996), p 37</ref>.
Most of the leadership in Carthage was opposed to another war with Rome and tried to block Hannibal’s strategy. The Senate or Assembly was controlled by a party that wanted peaceful co-existence with Rome and distrusted Hannibal. However, despite the elite Carthaginians' opposition to the war, under the leadership of Hanno the Great, they were unable to restrain Hannibal .<ref> Polybius, Rise of Rome. Iii</ref>.
While Hannibal was technically loyal to Carthage, he often acted as an independent sovereign in Iberia. The Carthaginians did not control him in Iberia. Indeed, the Barcid led the city-state into a war that they did not want. Hannibal could use his massive wealth from his Iberian conquests to bribe many Carthaginians politicians to support his anti-Roman policies.<ref> Garland, p 116</ref> They were populists who could sway public opinion and put pressure on the pro-peace faction to support Hannibal.
*[[Why did the Italian Renaissance End?]]
</div>
{{Mediawiki:Roman History}}
==References==
<references/>
[[Category:Wikis]]
[[Category:Roman History]] [[Category:Ancient History]] [[Category:Italian History]] [[Category:Military History]]
{{Contributors}}

Navigation menu