Changes

Jump to: navigation, search
no edit summary
== Rape as a Tool of Genocide ==
To make Bengalis “‘true Muslims,’” was the order given by General Yahya Khan.<ref>D’Costa, ''Nationbuilding, Gender and War Crimes'', 119.</ref>As a result of early inculcation and a multitude of propaganda, Pakistani Muslims hated Hindus. Although no official documentation exists, perpetrator accounts verify that the orders given by the Yahya regime and General Tikka Khan included forced impregnation on Bengali women. These women——presumed Hindus——were taken to “rape camps” where they were kept for months at a time in order to be serially raped with the goal of impregnating the women with Muslim fetuses. Joseph Fried of the ''New York Daily News'' reported from Dhaka that, “‘a stream of victims and eyewitnesses,’” relayed to him that, “‘truckloads of Pakistani soldiers…swooped down on villages in the night, rounding up women by force. Some were raped on the spot. Others were carried to military compounds.’”<ref>D’Costa, ''Nationbuilding, Gender and War Crimes,'' 121.</ref>No Bengali women were spared.
[[File:east bengali trying to rescue woman.jpg|thumbnail|300px|East Bengali man trying to save a woman who had just been raped.]]Women and girls aged 14-30 were the primary targets of the rapists; however, all age groups were sexually abused as a form of terror and a tool of genocide. In both Hindu and Muslim societies, a “woman symbolizes ethnic purity,” and “family honor is…linked with female chastity.”<ref>Lisa Sharlach, “Rape as Genocide: Bangladesh, the Former Yugoslavia, and Rwanda,”'' New Political Science'' 22, no. 1 (2000): 95.</ref>Following this cultural norm, a woman was tortured and serial raped for months at a time and survived, not to be seen as a victim, rather she was a source of shame upon her family. In Bangladesh society, women were seen as “private property,” thus the rape of a man’s wife was viewed as an insult to ''him'' as “his property has been usurped by another.”<ref>Nayanika Mookherjee, “‘Remembering to Forget’: Public Secrecy and Memory of Sexual Violence in the Bangladesh War of 1971,” ''Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute'' 12 (2006): 439, http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9655.2006.00299.x</ref>Therefore, by employing rape as a tool of degradation in a society where the chastity of a woman is a reflection on the family, the destruction of an entire community ensues; this is genocide.
The intent of the perpetrators was to destroy in whole or in part an entire group. Further, in a military and patriarchal society, “collective sexual violence…exemplifies an ethic of male exceptionalism,” whereby women are possessions belonging to one group or another. In sum, a reciprocal violation occurs during military rape in that there is a “simultaneous elevation of ‘our’ women in opposition to the degradation of ‘theirs.’”<ref>Roland Littlewood, “Military Rape,” ''Anthropology Today'' 13, no. 2 (April 1997): 9</ref>Following this line of reasoning to its logical end, the women of Bangladesh were used as tools in a war for liberation; a liberation they would never realize.

Navigation menu