Jump to: navigation, search

What started World War One

7,577 bytes added, 22:49, 1 March 2016
Created page with "The First World War was a human, economic and political catastrophe. It changed the map of Europe and led to further instability in the continent and around the globe. There h..."
The First World War was a human, economic and political catastrophe. It changed the map of Europe and led to further instability in the continent and around the globe. There has long been a debate about the exact cause of the First World War. Ultimately, German aggression and its attempts to secure a stronger strategic and military position in Europe led to the outbreak of the First World War.

By the summer of 1914, Europe had long been divided into two mutually hostile and suspicious power blocs. On one side was the German dominated bloc- known as the Central Powers. This comprised Germany, Austro-Hungary, Italy and the Ottoman Empire. On the other hand, there was a bloc that comprised the United Kingdom, France and the Russian Empire. The Unification of Germany and its victory in the Franco-Prussian War of 1870-71, led to a new balance of power on the continent.<ref> Kramer, Alan. (2014). "Recent Historiography of the First World War-Part I." ''Journal of Modern European History 121'' pp: 5-27</ref> Outside of Russia, Germany was the most powerful country. This and Imperial German diplomatic blunders resulted in the United Kingdom allying themselves with France, in order to counter any aggression from Berlin. They were later joined by Russia. In response, the Germans entered into an alliance with Austro-Hungry. Bismarck the German Chancellor in the 1870s and other European leaders sought to achieve a balance of power between the powers in Europe. It was hoped in this way to secure international peace. Some believe that such an international system was doomed to failure and this led directly to the outbreak of war.<ref>Hewitson, Mark. (2014). ''Germany and the causes of the First World War''. Bloomsbury Publishing: London, p. 17.</ref>

=Colonial Tensions=
While Germany was in many ways the most powerful country in Continental Europe it lacked a large colonial Empire. The French and British Empires extended over large areas of the globe. Europe strategists at the time believed that only countries with a large colonial empires could survive and prosper and the German political elite were eager to secure more colonies.<ref>Lewiston, ''Germany'', p. 54.</ref> German had some colonies in Africa and the Pacific Islands. This was not enough for German ambitions and they demanded more territories. Kaiser Wilhelm II, the German Emperor, demanded that his country have its ‘place in the sun’. These demands led to increasing international tensions.

A prime example of these imperial ambitions played out during the First Moroccan Crisis in 1905. France was the predominant power in Morocco and was slowly absorbing the North African country. In March 1905, the German Kaiser visited Morocco and gave his support to the Sultan. This emboldened the Moroccans to defy the French. The Kaiser’s intervention was widely seen as an effort to frustrate the French and to extend Germans influence in North Africa.<ref>Lewiston, ''Germany'', p. 67</ref> The French saw this as German interference with French internal affairs and threatened war. The colonial issue was very important in the lead up to the First World War. Many Marxists believed that the rivalry for colonies led directly to the outbreak of hostilities in 1914.

Most pre-war Europeans believed in the ‘cultural, economic and military supremacy of their nation’. They believed that their nation was entitled to dominate others and to have special privileges within the international system.<ref>Hew Strachan (2004). ''The First World War''. Viking Publishers: New York, p. 34.</ref> Nationalism was deliberately inflamed by newspapers and politicians. This was used to secure the allegiance of the population to the existing political elite. In many European countries, the traditional elites, such as landowners, the aristocracy and monarchies were able to stay in power by ‘harnessing the emotive power of nationalism’.<ref>Wehler, Hans-Ulrich (1985). ''The German Empire, 1871–1918'', Berg Publishers, 1985.</ref> This was particularly the case in Imperial Germany. Here the conservative elite, including the army and the aristocracy used nationalism to prevent the Social Democratic Party from assuming power in the country. However, Nationalism also created a scenario where countries viewed each other as their rivals and enemies. This meant that they were willing to go to war with their neighbors when there was a crisis in international relations in August 1914. <ref>Tuchman, Barbara, ''The Guns of August'', New York. The Macmillan Company, 1962</ref>

=Immediate Causes of World War I=
On 28 June 1914, Archduke Franz Ferdinand of Austria, heir presumptive to the Austro-Hungarian throne, and his wife, were shot dead in Sarajevo by a Serbian terrorist group. Austria demanded reparations from Serbia. Germany backed its ally Austro-Hungary. Austria threatened war with Serbia, but because that country was allied with Russia, it consulted Berlin.<ref>Tuchman, ''Guns of August'', p. 89.</ref>

Germany was eager to provoke a war it backed Austro- Hungry and encouraged them to take military action against Serbia, despite its alliance with Russia. German wanted to have an international confrontation with Russia. The Russian Empire was rapidly industrializing and many in Berlin feared Russia. They believed that they needed to defeat Russia in a war before it became too strong. The Germans used the crisis over the assassination to push forward their own objectives and to engineer a conflict with Russia. They also used the assassination to justify a war in the west with France. Imperial Germany were very aware of the hostility of France. The German military command had long planned for an offensive against France. They had devised the 'The Schlieffen Plan', which was a surprise attack on France, even though it involved the violation of the neutrality of Belgium.<ref> Stevenson, David (2004). ''Cataclysm: The First World War As Political Tragedy'', p. 111.</ref>

German was very aware that it was surrounded by enemies and it decided that war could help to improve its military and strategic position in Europe. During the crisis of August 1914, the Germans launched an attack on France as envisioned in the Schlieffen Plan. They used the crisis in August 1914 as a justification for a pre-emptive war in order to ensure that it was not militarily defeated in the near future by Russia in the east and France and the United Kingdom in the west.<ref>Stevenson, ''Cataclysm'', p. 117.</ref>
German Soldiers in 1914.

The First World War was a tragedy for Europe and the Globe. It was a result of many things. These included balance of power politics, colonial rivalry and nationalism. The primary cause of the conflict was the German decision to take advantage of the assassination of Archduke Ferdinand in order to further its own strategic and military interests. Germany was in a weak strategic position with regard to its main rivals especially Russia. It sought to secure its position in Europe not by political or diplomatic means but by military means. In August 1914, Germany initiated the war in order to assert its position in Europe and make sure that it remained the continental Europe’s major power. Ultimately, it was to prove a disastrous decision as it resulted in the catastrophic defeat of Germany.


[[Category:German History]] [[Category:Military History]][[Category:European History]] [[Category:World War One History]]

Navigation menu